From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "'Cedar Cox'" <cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com>, "'pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "'Vince Vielhaber'" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: AW: RE: RE: RE: ODBC and Access 2000 |
Date: | 2001-05-23 13:56:55 |
Message-ID: | 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A2B9D@woody.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cedar Cox [mailto:cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com]
> Sent: 23 May 2001 14:17
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: RE: AW: [ODBC] RE: RE: RE: ODBC and Access 2000
>
>
>
> On Wed, 23 May 2001, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > > For downloads I'm also pointing to the FTP site.
> >
> > Yes. I think if the three pages I've listed above, and
> faq.html can be
> > added to the site as proper pages (i.e. formatted to match
> the rest of
> > the site, and served by httpd, then the copies in the ftp
> area can be
> > removed, so that the ftp area is purely for downloads. That way
> > odbc.postgresql.org *is* the one source of good odbc info.
> >
> > Regards, Dave.
>
> I actually just mentioned this to Vince.. The html files
> don't necessarily have to to be removed from the ftp site....
>
> BTW, you probably didn't notice, the ftp stuff is actually
> served by http..
No I didn't notice - I must admit I've been a little distracted today by
someone else's code that appeared in one of my programs :-(.
Leaving the files in the ftp site might be useful to others. If Vince
applies his formatting to them (should be relatively easy, I already
stripped them to barebones html), and uses those copies in the website then
I can continue to update the content as required - hey presto, one ftp site
and www site permanently in sync!
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2001-05-23 16:06:41 | RE: AW: RE: RE: RE: ODBC and Access 2000 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2001-05-23 13:45:00 | RE: AW: RE: RE: RE: ODBC and Access 2000 |