Re: pg_dump bug fixing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug fixing
Date: 2004-07-19 03:55:57
Message-ID: 8528.1090209357@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
> I think what we want is a clean template without all of the extras that
> template1 has.

Sounds like a job for ... template0 !

Seriously, this thread would be more convincing if anyone in it betrayed
any knowledge that pg_dump wants you to start from template0 rather than
template1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-07-19 04:14:42 Re: CVS compile failure
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-19 03:49:22 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery