Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements
Date: 2007-02-16 03:42:00
Message-ID: 8408.1171597320@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:50, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Why not output the data in COPY format instead?

> Yeah, that was my initial idea too... But because the TODO item clearly
> mentions INSERT, I thought maybe there was some very specific reason for the
> output to be in INSERT stmts.. ..

I don't think the TODO entry was particularly carefully thought out.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-16 03:56:17 Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-02-16 01:20:52 Re: patch adding new regexp functions

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-16 04:55:53 Re: Avg performance for int8/numeric
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-16 03:39:44 Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates