Re: qsort (was Re: Solaris)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mike Castle <dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: qsort (was Re: Solaris)
Date: 2003-05-02 05:31:06
Message-ID: 8405.1051853466@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> The HPUX results are interesting !

I can confirm the results for the i % mod case on my HPUX 10.20 system
(I get about 2.65 sec vs 4.40 sec) and also the i ^ 0x5555555 case
(about 7.25 vs 12.85 sec). Didn't try the other cases...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erol Oz 2003-05-02 07:03:40 VACUUM FULL PROBLEM
Previous Message Dennis Gearon 2003-05-02 05:10:28 Re: qsort (was Re: Solaris)