Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sat, 03 May 2008 13:14:35 -0400 Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think the use-case for varying the WAL segment size is unrelated to
>>> performance of the master server, but would instead be concerned with
>>> adjusting the granularity of WAL log shipping.
> Seems the stuff to zero out the unused segment tail would be more useful
> here.
Well, that's also useful, but it hardly seems like a substitute for
picking a more optimal segment size in the first place.
regards, tom lane