Re: GUID/UUID Support

From: "Chad Wagner" <chad(dot)wagner(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Patrick Earl" <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUID/UUID Support
Date: 2007-01-17 17:37:34
Message-ID: 81961ff50701170937m39bb028yc71fec8522469ec7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/17/07, Patrick Earl <patearl(at)patearl(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Certainly support for the GUID field type itself is most important.
> As for the generators, though they are non-essential, they are very
> useful. Other platforms and libraries have standardized on uuid
> generators, so I don't see why PostgreSQL can't.

Maybe I am oblivious to the reason, but why is there a need for a special
data type for GUID/UUIDs? Wouldn't you always be doing an "equality"
anyways? Wouldn't a varchar suffice?

--
Chad
http://www.postgresqlforums.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message novnov 2007-01-17 17:41:03 Re: Speed of postgres compared to ms sql, is this article/comment
Previous Message Jan Mura 2007-01-17 17:34:15 Building web sites using a database