Re: New tests for new bugs (was Re: [BUGS] Re: backend dies on 7.1.1 loading large datamodel.)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New tests for new bugs (was Re: [BUGS] Re: backend dies on 7.1.1 loading large datamodel.)
Date: 2001-05-08 20:35:26
Message-ID: 8106.989354126@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> The query that showed the bug would serve just fine.

Most of the bug reports we get are far too bulky to be appropriate to
add to the regress tests as-is. IMHO anyway.

We do need more extensive regress tests, but I don't think that slapping
bug-report samples into them is the right way to get there ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgsql-bugs 2001-05-09 12:54:03 PostgreSQL 7.1.1: Backend crash when calling plpgsql function
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-05-08 20:17:56 New tests for new bugs (was Re: [BUGS] Re: backend dies on 7.1.1 loading large datamodel.)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2001-05-08 21:14:46 Re: MULTIBYTE and SQL_ASCII (was Re: [JDBC] Re: A bugwith pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars?)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-05-08 20:17:56 New tests for new bugs (was Re: [BUGS] Re: backend dies on 7.1.1 loading large datamodel.)