Re: psql SET/RESET/SHOW tab completion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql SET/RESET/SHOW tab completion
Date: 2005-08-13 16:41:51
Message-ID: 8106.1123951311@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> Is 162 a typo or are you working on something that hasn't been
> committed yet? I see 161 in the latest code.

Uh, I get 162 ... and no I don't have any uncommitted changes ATM.

The last change I see in guc.c was two days ago (latest autovacuum
additions), so that should certainly have settled out. Do you want
to send me your results (off-list), and I'll compare to what I get?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-08-13 16:57:51 Re: SPI: ERROR: no snapshot has been set
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-13 16:36:42 Re: SPI: ERROR: no snapshot has been set