| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |
| Date: | 2012-03-02 17:48:30 |
| Message-ID: | 8047.1330710510@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> It would probably be prudent to concentrate on getting the core
>> infrastructure committed first. That way, we at least know that if
>> this doesn't get into 9.2, we can work on getting it into 9.3 knowing
>> that once committed, people won't have to wait over a year at the very
> I don't see why we can't commit the whole thing. This is way more ready
> for prime-time than checksums.
We'll get to it in due time. In case you haven't noticed, there's a lot
of stuff in this commitfest. And I don't follow the logic that says
that because Simon is trying to push through a not-ready-for-commit
patch we should drop our standards for other patches.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-03-02 18:37:35 | Re: Runtime SHAREDIR for testing CREATE EXTENSION |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-03-02 17:35:23 | Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) |