| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #15668: Server crash in transformPartitionRangeBounds |
| Date: | 2019-03-26 01:24:52 |
| Message-ID: | 8029569e-70e2-e054-2cc5-b6806506780c@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2019/03/26 10:15, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Done as you suggested, with a minimal set enough to trigger the crash,
> still the error message is rather misleading as you would expect :)
Thanks for committing.
>> A separate thread will definitely attract more attention, at least in due
>> time. :)
>
> Sure. For now I have committed a lighter version of 0001, with
> tweaked comments based on your suggestion, as well as a minimum set of
> test cases. I have added on the way some tests for range partitions
> which have been missing from the start, and improved the existing set
> by removing the original "a.a" references, and switching to use
> max(date) for range partitions to bump correctly on the aggregate
> error. I am just updating the second patch now and I'll begin a new
> thread soon.
Thanks.
Regards,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-26 02:45:27 | Re: BUG #15631: Generated as identity field in a temporary table with on commit drop corrupts system catalogs |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-26 01:15:32 | Re: BUG #15668: Server crash in transformPartitionRangeBounds |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-03-26 01:57:29 | Re: psql display of foreign keys |
| Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2019-03-26 01:19:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |