Re: Doc patch, put pg_temp into the documentation's index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Doc patch, put pg_temp into the documentation's index
Date: 2012-11-17 14:54:18
Message-ID: 8008.1353164058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:10 -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
>> pg_temp-toindex.patch
>> Puts pg_temp into the index of the docs.

> But there is no object called pg_temp. It always pg_temp_NNNN
> something. How should that be indexed?

We do <replaceable>NNNN</> in a lot of places, and that seems
serviceable enough, at least in output formats where the NNNN can be
rendered differently from plain text. I don't remember though whether
the sgml index infrastructure allows markup in an index item.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2012-11-17 14:56:06 Re: foreign key locks
Previous Message David Johnston 2012-11-17 14:44:06 Re: Parser - Query Analyser