Re: UPDATE of partition key

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UPDATE of partition key
Date: 2017-03-02 07:17:37
Message-ID: 7bb85253-be4b-5e58-902a-71b5748a4840@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/02/26 4:01, David G. Johnston wrote:
> IIUC ​it is already possible, for those who care to do so, to get a
> serialization failure in this scenario by upgrading isolation to repeatable
> read.

Maybe, this can be added as a note in the documentation.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stas Kelvich 2017-03-02 07:27:51 Re: logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-03-02 07:05:19 Re: user mapping messages