Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables?

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables?
Date: 2008-10-15 14:50:57
Message-ID: 7F91BC0B-95CA-4417-811A-6D4BC3188748@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 14, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>
>>> Standard DBAs are blind to LOG level messages.
>>
>> Indeed, which is why I'm not too concerned about Heikki's complaint.
>
> Well, if the disk fills up due to excessive LOG entries, they won't be
> so blind. I think just adding the HINT is good enough.

Since this is something that's not supposed to happen, making it a
WARNING might be appropriate too...
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Decibel! 2008-10-15 15:06:58 Re: How is random_page_cost=4 ok?
Previous Message Robert Treat 2008-10-15 14:50:01 Re: Column level triggers