Re: Locales and Encodings

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Locales and Encodings
Date: 2007-10-12 15:30:40
Message-ID: 7E789DE4-170D-4513-91DA-4E9943E04F9C@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Oct 12, 2007, at 10:19 , Gregory Stark wrote:

> It would make Postgres inconsistent and less integrated with the
> rest of the
> OS. How do you explain that Postgres doesn't follow the system's
> configurations and the collations don't agree with the system
> collations?

How is this fundamentally different from PostgreSQL using a separate
users/roles system than the OS?

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-10-12 15:56:06 Re: Locales and Encodings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-10-12 15:27:41 Re: pg_tablespace_size()