contrib/rtree_gist into core system?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: contrib/rtree_gist into core system?
Date: 2005-06-26 14:03:46
Message-ID: 7966.1119794626@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've mentioned this a couple times now, but here is an official
proposal:

I would like to move the contrib/rtree_gist functionality into the core
system before feature freeze. There are a couple arguments in favor:

* It's way past time GiST indexes got some regression testing in the
core build. rtree_gist is the only very plausible candidate for
near-term integration: I don't think tsearch2 is ready for that, and
the other GiST-using contrib modules are not of sufficient general
usefulness.

* With the recent WAL-ization and hoped-for concurrency fixes, GiST
is definitely superior to R-tree for practical use. I don't see the
percentage in continuing to maintain the R-tree code indefinitely.
By integrating the opclasses needed to replace R-tree, we can start
down the path to deprecating and eventually removing R-tree.

Any objections?

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-26 14:14:25 Re: tsearch2 changes need backpatching?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-26 13:54:08 tsearch2 changes need backpatching?