| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
| Cc: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: xlog patches reviewed |
| Date: | 2001-03-13 00:20:41 |
| Message-ID: | 7932.984442841@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> but it's hard to notice eg misprints in 44K file -:)
> I think we should apply patches and hard test
> recovering for a few days (power off/pg_ctl -m i stop
> with dozens update transactions).
OK. I haven't finished putting together an xlog-reset utility quite
yet, but I will go ahead and apply what I have.
CAUTION TO ONLOOKERS: if you update from CVS after I make this patch,
you will need to initdb!! Wait around for the log-reset utility if you
are running a database you don't want to initdb. I should have that in
another day or so.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-03-13 00:24:37 | Re: xlog patches reviewed |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-13 00:15:32 | Re: AW: AW: AW: WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace |