Re: Better spam filtering?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:28:59 -0700 Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
wrote:

> Marc,
>
>> Well, when you come up with something better, do let me know ... my other
>> clients use it and haven't had any complaints, and its well used ...
>
> Sure. Standard spamassassin. Dspam. Anything which allows me to flag spam
> *through an e-mail interface*, and does not require me to flag *every single
> message in the queue* in order to flag any of them.

Flag them all as Delete and then only flag those as spam that you want to so
that the others don't affect your Bayes database?

But, as press(at)postgresql(dot)org is a mailing list, and not a mailbox, who do you
propose 'flagging spam through an e-mail interface'?

What we could do is remove the mailing list, make it a mailbox and let you
download email via POP3 so that you could then setup whatever you want on your
desktop for spam tagging / filtering ... the only ppl on press are
greg(at)turnstep(dot)com, you and I ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGxJJC4QvfyHIvDvMRAhpgAKCHn0DwJHLgyx7wDBaURGDokWl1WwCgpF09
+Zb6+BvNzq1kiyXnPs7nowc=
=sed6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----