Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

From: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date: 2010-01-22 08:11:28
Message-ID: 788271.67623.qm@web29002.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > So my proposal would be: do the test seq_scan vs sort/index_scan only for
> > regular btree index, and integrate that test in the planner.
>
> Keep in mind that this patch was after the deadline for 9.0, so there
> is probably not a huge rush to get this done.

That's true; I'll try to get the whole thing done then...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Huda Booley (huda@careerjunction.co.za) 2010-01-22 08:42:33 Standby server lagging behind
Previous Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2010-01-22 08:06:13 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0