=?utf-8?Q?Christiaan_Willemsen?= <cwillemsen(at)technocon(dot)com> writes:
> Back again ;) I just checked pg_depend, and according to it there is no relation between in de table and the sequence... There is however a relation between the new table and the old sequence (as expected). So this is sill a mistery.
Hm, I might have gotten the direction of the link backwards --- if you
swap objid and refobjid, do you find an entry linking the sequence to
the old table's default?
regards, tom lane