Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes
Date: 2002-08-19 15:21:53
Message-ID: 7817.1029770513@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> You should stop right here and investigate the reason for the crash.

> It's the same reason as before -- i.e. the TEXTOID assertion in
> patternsel(). I just didn't expect to see physical index corruption as a
> result.

Oh really? Yeah, I'm surprised too (and not happy). Let's definitely
see that test case...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-19 15:59:55 Re: Success: Finished porting application to postgreSQL
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2002-08-19 15:17:44 Re: Success: Finished porting application to postgreSQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-19 16:32:02 Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes
Previous Message Joe Conway 2002-08-19 15:12:19 Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes