Re: GUC patch for Win32

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC patch for Win32
Date: 2003-05-02 03:41:44
Message-ID: 7743.1051846904@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The patch basically writes all modified GUC variables to a binary file
> that can be read in by newly created exec'ed backends.

Where exactly is the interlock to ensure that the new backend will end up
with the correct settings if someone is changing the values at about
the time of the fork?

The relcache code has this problem solved, but I'm unconvinced that GUC
does.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-02 03:58:18 Re: GUC patch for Win32
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-05-01 20:13:08 GUC patch for Win32