From: | "Jay Howard" <jhoward(at)alumni(dot)utexas(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Kris Jurka" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: passing user defined data types to stored procedures |
Date: | 2008-11-15 18:20:41 |
Message-ID: | 7569a8ec0811151020v4e4be7a8ld527f05f77508b80@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Actually it may not have been an array of integers. I was doing stuff with
composite types, so that may be the problem. The message I got from
getArray() indicated that the "full" version of that method, which it must
call internally, wasn't implemented. I'll verify tonight and respond with
some sample code.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008, Jay Howard wrote:
>
> Is it possible to return (and pass) arrays using java.sql.Array?
>>
>> I wrote a test proc that returns an array of integers. I can retrieve it
>> on
>> the java side as a Jdbc3Array, which implements java.sql.Array.
>>
>> Unfortunately, getArray() (and its variants) seem not to have been
>> implemented yet by Jdbc3Array.
>>
>>
> getArray is implemented and should work. Perhaps you're getting confused
> because you're expecting to receive int[] and you're getting Integer[]
> instead? It's tough to say what's going wrong without some example code.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | fschmidt | 2008-11-15 21:00:39 | committing an aborted transaction |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2008-11-15 18:02:21 | Re: passing user defined data types to stored procedures |