| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, venkat <ven(dot)tammineni(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How to insert Ecoded values into postrgresql |
| Date: | 2010-04-20 15:07:54 |
| Message-ID: | 7568.1271776074@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given the lack of field complaints, I think changing this would be a
>> pretty terrible idea; much more likely to break things than fix them.
>> It's not like that RFC has huge recognition as The Standard.
> Should we document we support the standard?
I'm inclined to think not: there's no evidence that anyone cares about
compliance to that RFC, and anyway we *don't* support the standard
exactly, per Merlin's report. We'd have to say something like "we
support the standard except for line-endings", which is only going to
muddy the waters.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | sunpeng | 2010-04-20 15:19:40 | how to debug the codes in the PostgresMain() from the begining of this function to the "for (;;)" loop that handles the connection? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-20 14:55:29 | Re: How to insert Ecoded values into postrgresql |