| From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Allison <tom(at)tacocat(dot)net>, Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql and Mac OS X |
| Date: | 2007-04-30 22:26:47 |
| Message-ID: | 7455B72C-6876-46A3-BDB9-2E5F496F29DA@seespotcode.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Apr 30, 2007, at 16:39 , Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, Apple uses Postgres as a part of Remote Desktop, but I don't
> think
> they intend it for general use --- it deliberately uses a nonstandard
> port to avoid conflicting with a regular PG server.
Really? I've had the Remote Desktop postgres instance prevent others
from starting on the default port. Matter of fact, I see that it
started up on 5432 just right now. I wonder if the Remote Desktop
doesn't check if something else is running on 5432 on startup and use
another port if it's already in use. Note that I don't think the
Remote Desktop postgres instance starts on system startup; from
observation it looks like Remote Desktop needs to be launched for its
postgres server to start.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Allison | 2007-04-30 22:53:50 | Re: pgsql and Mac OS X |
| Previous Message | Erik Jones | 2007-04-30 22:23:33 | Re: pgsql and Mac OS X |