| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
| Date: | 2001-10-04 20:48:37 |
| Message-ID: | 743.1002228517@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> ... then trailing zeros are hacked out,
> two digits at a time.
I was wondering why it seemed to always want to produce an even number
of fractional digits. Why are you doing it 2 at a time and not 1?
I should think timestamp(1) would produce 1 fractional digit, not
two digits of which the second is always 0 ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-04 21:02:02 | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-04 20:30:24 | Re: Unhappiness with forced precision conversion for timestamp |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-04 21:02:02 | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-04 20:13:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |