Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Date: 2006-11-25 21:08:08
Message-ID: 73C5A3B95F6B83BFD0640D12@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Saturday, November 25, 2006 15:58:41 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:

> So if you ask me, we are past the point of diminishing returns for the
> current level of testing. Putting out an RC might draw the attention of
> a few more people, but really the only way we are going to find more
> bugs is to put out a release. Or perhaps knock heads together a little
> harder on pgsql-hackers to make people think less about 8.3 development
> and more about 8.2 testing, but how successful is that likely to be?

Based on experience ... not very. And I'm not voicing against LISA, I'm just
agreeing with Joshua that it shouldn't the "requirement" ... if we are ready,
no arguments from this end ...

Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFaLC44QvfyHIvDvMRAnO3AKCJy+ghmE4dLk1/jQ0jWEw+ySbWJgCfeFlB
928t3jXtaKIgwE+GSSigU1g=
=mVks
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-11-25 21:21:25 Re: First Release Candidate Uploaded ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-25 20:58:41 Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues