Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks

From: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Stefano Nichele <stefano(dot)nichele(at)gmail(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
Date: 2009-01-07 23:36:51
Message-ID: 73908.13976.qm@web23606.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

--- On Wed, 7/1/09, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Just to elaborate on the horror that is a Dell perc5e. We
> have one in
> a 1950 with battery backed cache (256 Meg I think). It has
> an 8 disk
> 500Gig SATA drive RAID-10 array and 4 1.6GHz cpus and 10
> Gigs ram.

Our perc5i controllers performed better in raid 5 that 10. Sounds like the comment you made when I was wasting my time with that perc3 fits all dell cards perfectly; "brain damaged"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-01-07 23:43:15 Re: understanding postgres issues/bottlenecks
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-01-07 23:33:50 Re: Are random writes optimized sequentially by Linux kernel?