On 4/14/20 4:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> writes:
>> That said, I agree with that quite many of our tables right now are
>> ugly, but I prefer ugly to hard to read. For me the mix of having every
>> third row split into two fields makes the tables very hard to read. I
>> have a hard time seeing which rows belong to which function.
>
> Did you look at the variants without that discussed downthread?
Yeah, I did some of them are quite readable, for example your latest two
screenshots of table 9.10.
Andreas