Re: Installing PostgreSQL on Win 2003 R2 64-bit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Aly Dharshi" <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net>, "Stanislaw Tristan" <admin(at)zestad(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Installing PostgreSQL on Win 2003 R2 64-bit
Date: 2006-04-28 14:29:08
Message-ID: 723.1146234548@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> On 4/27/06, Aly Dharshi <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net> wrote:
>> Either of these approaches could work, but expect to be
>> hacking around wierd problems. There is decent chance pgsql
>> will be officially supported on windows as of 8.2, scheduled
>> for release this summer.

> Um. That's the first I heard 8.2 was scheduled for release this summer.
> AFAIK the curernt time-estimate is that it shuld go beta towards the end
> of the summer, which means a release sometime Q4 if we follow previous
> patterns.

I was kind of amused by the bit about "officially supported as of 8.2",
too. That doesn't have anything to do with any reality I know of.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Volker Aßmann 2006-04-28 14:47:09 Postmaster process on port 10000
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2006-04-28 14:14:15 Re: Init script for 8.1 compiled on Debian Stable