Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and

From: "Steve Poe" <steve(dot)poe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: "Alex Turner" <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Date: 2006-08-09 06:56:38
Message-ID: 721b21dc0608082356i5ffc48c4wf8f9caa9402ba1a4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Luke,

I hope so. I'll keep you and the list up-to-date as I learn more.

Steve

On 8/8/06, Luke Lonergan <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
> > I will do that. If it is the general impression that this
> > server should perform well with Postgresql, Are the RAID
> > cards, the 6i and 642 sufficient to your knowledge? I am
> > wondering if it is the disc array itself.
>
> I think that is the question to be answered by HP support. Ask them for
> technical support for the Linux driver for the 6i and 642. If they
> offer support, they should quickly figure out what the problem is. If
> they don't provide support, I would send the server back to them if you
> can and buy a Sun server with an LSI RAID adapter.
>
> - Luke
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arjen van der Meijden 2006-08-09 07:38:19 Re: most bang for buck with ~ $20,000
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2006-08-09 06:50:24 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and