| From: | Misa Simic <misa(dot)simic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.2 Beta: intersection of daterange |
| Date: | 2012-05-16 08:27:41 |
| Message-ID: | 7137589199374978896@unknownmsgid |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I think result is ok... 2010-01-04 is not inside first range...
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Brar Piening
Sent: 16/05/2012 09:53
To: pgsql-hackers
Subject: [HACKERS] 9.2 Beta: intersection of daterange
I'm currently doing some tests on range types:
tests=# SELECT int8range(5,15) * int8range(10,20) AS intersection;
intersection
--------------
[10,15)
(1 Zeile)
tests=#
tests=# SELECT '[2010-03-15,2010-05-22)'::daterange *
'[2010-01-04,)'::daterange AS intersection;
intersection
-------------------------
[2010-03-15,2010-05-22)
(1 Zeile)
Does the second query trigger a bug or am I misunderstanding something?
I would expect [2010-01-04,2010-05-22) as result.
Regards,
Brar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brar Piening | 2012-05-16 08:40:19 | Re: 9.2 Beta: intersection of daterange |
| Previous Message | Brar Piening | 2012-05-16 07:52:21 | 9.2 Beta: intersection of daterange |