Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check
Date: 2006-10-04 15:23:16
Message-ID: 7108.1159975396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

I wrote:
> Let me finish investigating the 2.x series and get back to you on that.

2.1 indeed seems to be the only version that emits the busted semicolon.
I found that 2.2 and 2.3 both fail one of their "make check" tests on my
machine --- if that's widespread it might explain a slow uptake rate for
these versions :-(. But the failure is in one of the GLR tests and
shouldn't affect us. All four 2.x versions produce gram.c files that
compile and pass regression for me.

So I'd vote for "allow 1.875 and up, except 2.1 specifically".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2006-10-04 15:52:17 Re: timestamptz alias
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-04 14:52:37 Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD 2006-10-04 15:58:44 Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-04 14:52:37 Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check