Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ
Date: 2008-05-02 16:16:40
Message-ID: 7078.1209745000@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

"Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I still believe it makes sense to have them separated. I did have
> some data, which has since been destroyed, that suggested there were
> some system characterization differences for OLTP workloads with
> PostgreSQL. Let's hope those disks get delivered to Portland soon. :)

Fair enough. It's not that much more code to have another configure
switch --- will go do that.

If we are allowing blocksize and relation seg size to have configure
switches, seems that symmetry would demand that XLOG_SEG_SIZE be
configurable as well. Thoughts?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-05-02 16:28:48 Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ
Previous Message Mark Wong 2008-05-02 16:12:32 Re: configure option for XLOG_BLCKSZ