Re: LVM snapshots [Follow-up]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Murthy Kambhampaty <murthy(dot)kambhampaty(at)goeci(dot)com>
Cc: "'Matt Clark'" <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net>, "'Peter Eisentraut'" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LVM snapshots [Follow-up]
Date: 2003-04-04 15:51:35
Message-ID: 7018.1049471495@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Murthy Kambhampaty <murthy(dot)kambhampaty(at)goeci(dot)com> writes:
> A checkpoint process may have to be ongoing when the snapshot creation
> (filesystem freeze) occurs, for this situation to arise. (Reduce the
> checkpoint segments and interval to test.)

If LVM manipulations are needed to cause it, I would think it's LVM's
bug not Postgres'.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-04-04 16:46:25 Re: Speed & Memory Management
Previous Message Murthy Kambhampaty 2003-04-04 15:18:03 Re: LVM snapshots [Follow-up]