| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict |
| Date: | 2008-12-01 15:14:18 |
| Message-ID: | 6F541CCC-FC8C-4278-B31E-0DDF6DD6A192@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM, David E. Wheeler
> <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> it depends on how you look at it, I suppose. If you look at ":xy"
>> as "x"
>> being the 10s position and "y" being the 1s position, it makes no
>> sense.
>
> Suffice it to say, I don't look at it that way :-). I'd wager most
> people wouldn't either, but I have no data to back that up of course.
Yeah, I could see that. It makes no sense to me (":3" just looks
weird), but maybe I just think too much like a computer. ;-)
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-12-01 15:26:07 | Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2008-12-01 15:13:41 | Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict |