Re: Simplifying identification of temporary tables

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simplifying identification of temporary tables
Date: 2005-07-14 20:12:35
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3415C2DA8@Herge.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> That would respond to the abstraction concern in a more complete
> fashion. I thought about that one too, but felt that the ability to
> look at the whole pg_class row (and not only check existence) had some
> value. Also, I've seen people doing things like
> ... where relname LIKE 'pattern' and ...
> which still works with the namespace OID function but would not work
> with a does_temp_table_exist() function. I wouldn't object to doing
> both this and the OID function, though. Do you have a proposal for
> the exact spelling of the exists() function?

I guess pg_temp_table_exists(text) is the most straightforward.

Merlin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-07-14 20:29:34 Re: [Bizgres-general] A Guide to Constraint Exclusion
Previous Message David Fetter 2005-07-14 20:09:16 Re: Toward pg_upgrade