Greg Stark wrote:
> imposed no such conditions. If Microsoft wanted to release a Microsoft
> Postgresql under a completely proprietary license they would be free
to do
I have often wondered, in a completely off-topic and unproductive sort
of way, if exactly that has not already been done by an unscrupulous or
semi-scrupulous commercial vendor. This has been done in the past (a
certain vendor's tcp/ip stack comes to mind), but I wonder if anyone
ever pulled it with this project.
Merlin