Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings
Date: 2011-08-12 19:10:51
Message-ID: 6E17DFE7-4F84-4803-8A32-836D1F360D29@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Aug 12, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>> I figure there might be warnings you haven't seen if you haven't been
>> building with bonjour, perl, openssl, pam, libxml, or ossp-uuid, so
>> I've attached the output.
>
> We have a build farm member (smew) that covers all of that except
> bonjour, but I can confirm that there are no additional warnings on
> account of that.

Ah, great, thanks!

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-08-12 19:14:07 Re: VACUUM FULL versus system catalog cache invalidation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-08-12 19:09:55 Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings