Re: Minor inheritance/check bug: Inconsistent behavior

On Saturday, June 29, 2013 4:58 AM Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:31:49AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Friday, January 25, 2013 8:36 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 02:04:51PM +0000, Amit kapila wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:50:05 -0400 Robert Hass wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Amit Kapila
> > <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)
> > > com> wrote:
> > > >>> AFAICT during Update also, it doesn't contain useful. The only
> > chance it
> > > >>> would have contain something useful is when it goes for
> > EvalPlanQual and
> > > >>> then again comes to check for constraints. However these
> > attributes get
> > > >>> filled in heap_update much later.
> > > >
> > > >>> So now should the fix be that it returns an error for system
> > column
> > > >>> reference except for OID case?
> > >
> > > >> +1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> 1. I think in this scenario the error for system column except for
> > tableOID
> > >> should be thrown at Create/Alter time.
> > >
> > >> 2. After setting OID in ExecInsert/ExecUpdate may be setting of same
> > inside
> > >> heap functions can be removed.
> > >
> > >> But for now I have kept them as it is.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >> Please find the Patch for bug-fix.
> > >
> > >> If this is okay, I shall send you the test cases for same.
> >
> >> Did we ever make any progress on this?
>
>> I have done the initial analysis and prepared a patch, don't know if
>> anything more I can do until
>> someone can give any suggestions to further proceed on this bug.

>So, I guess we never figured this out.

I can submit this bug-fix for next commitfest if there is no objection for doing so.
What is your opinion?

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.