Re: [HACKERS] anoncvs still slow

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] anoncvs still slow
Date: 2006-05-29 14:55:02
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA3544F@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> > svr4 / anoncvs needs a major upgrade ... the problem is
> that the only
> > part of that vServer that I know nothing about is the bittorrent
> > stuff, which, in itself, needs an upgrade ...
> > I sent a note to Magnus that, whenever he's ready with the
> bittorrent
> > stuff, I can do the rest of the upgrade, so its in his
> court right now
> > :)
>
> Um, *what*?
>
> AFAICS, this is caused by the machine attempting to relay
> thousands and thousands of spam emails (some quick checked
> showed a rate of about 1 spam / 5 seconds enytering the queue
> - and I know I deleted almost 20,000 from the queue)

Actually, the rate appears to have gone down a little. But I still
deleted about 15,000 new spams in the queue when I got back after the
weekend.

[moving this one over to -www, which is at least slightly more on topic
for it]

//Magnus

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-05-31 23:13:46 Bad link for donations
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2006-05-28 16:20:08 Re: Why is April 21 listed twice in the pgsql-general web archive?