Re: Web code license

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Web code license
Date: 2006-03-17 10:03:16
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA3515D@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> > So...
> >
> > I'm looking at putting in the code for the "new techdocs" in cvs
> > sometime soon, and realised I forgot this question :)
> >
> > The code uses tinymce (http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/) for visual
> > editing.
>
> There's a coincidence - guess what I've been hacking about
> all morning!

:-)

> > This is LGPL code. My question is, should this be added to
> cvs (with
> > appropriate license files etc, of course), or should it be kept
> > outside (like the PEAR components we rely on for example).
>
> It should be kept outside I think - perhaps under /files so
> it's nicely seperated.

/files/ is in cvs.
/files/ is what I had in mind when I said "in cvs". :-) Certainly not
sticking it inside the framework code.

//Magnus

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2006-03-17 10:13:10 Re: Web code license
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-03-17 10:02:17 Re: Web code license