Re: API changes in patch release

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Thomas Hallgren" <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <dallas(dot)morlock(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: API changes in patch release
Date: 2006-05-23 19:25:42
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F9B8@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > This change will force me to a) introduce patch level sensitive
> > conditionals in the code, and b) have two PostgreSQL 8.1.n
> compatible
> > releases of PL/Java. One where n < 4 and another where n >=
> 4. I would
> > like to avoid this in the future if possible. API's should remain
> > stable during patch releases.
> >
> > Having said that, I've been in the game long enough to know that
> > Utopia doesn't exist. You probably had a very good reason
> to break the
> > compatibility.
>
> I don't think any of us realized the change would affect
> third-party projects.

To help specifically PL/Java next time, is there any chance to get it
included in the buildfarm builds? If it had been there, it would've been
caught right away...

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-23 19:27:46 Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate definition of LOCALEDIR
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-05-23 19:18:21 Re: [GENERAL] Weird ..... (a=1 or a=2) <> (a=2 or a=1)