| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance |
| Date: | 2005-10-23 16:31:59 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E780@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Here's another version of this patch ;-) I've based it on
> your patch,
> > so the changes to ovalue etc should sitill be there.
>
> This looks fairly reasonable to me, but I'm feeling a bit
> gun-shy after the previous fiasco. Before we consider
> applying it so late in beta, I'd like to get Merlin or
> another one of the win32 hackers to sign off on the patch too.
Definitly agreed. I'd like to see both Merlin and Andrew run through the
same test suites they did before. And it wouldn't hurt to get a test run
on a differnet OS - so far I've only tested on XP SP2. I doubt there
would be OS specific differences, but jus tin case...
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2005-10-23 16:53:35 | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-23 16:29:07 | Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance |