Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

> > I can unfortunatly conform that I'm also seeing this :-(
> I'm seeing it
> > in some kind of tight loop in the plpgsql regression test. Either
> > that, or it's just doing something *really* slowly. Doing
> some poking
> > at it with procexp I see it always being somewhere in a callstack
> > that's
> > around:
>
> Which test command is it executing exactly? I'm wondering
> about the part of the test that exercises statement_timeout.
> Could we somehow have broken the ability to detect timeout
> interrupts ... and if so, how?

Does that test run in the pl/pgsql test, using pl/pgsql code? If so it's
quite likely - it doesn't crash, and it does *something*. And it's
signal related... Could be if we waited long enough (>8 hours!) it goes
on with an error.

> Has anyone checked whether the backend still responds to
> SIGINT with the patch in place?

Nope, sorry.

If nobody else beats me, I can hopefully take alook at it tomorrow.
Just heading out now, so I can't check now.

//Magnus