| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Co-admininning pgsql-announce |
| Date: | 2005-12-06 08:44:33 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7CD9@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> re: postings to pgsql-announce ... as I've told others, if
> you post something, send me an email directly to let me know
> and I can login right there and then to process it through ...
>
> re: reply-to ... sure, but it won't fix your bounce issue,
> since things like postmaster and mailer-daemon don't honor
> reply-to's, as far as I know ... or do they?
They most definitly shouldn't. (That said, I'm sure there are some that
do. But even M$ Exchange doesn't :P)
There is, however, an Errors-To header you can set. Far from all mailers
support that one, but some do. And IIRC there is an RFC about it
somewhere, so it's not home-invented.
> regardless if they do or not, teh reply to needs to be set to
> something legit, so where would you have it set to? pgsql-general?
Yes, the Reply-To is for human responses. So setting it to a different
list seems quite reasonable.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-12-06 08:56:49 | Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2 |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-12-06 08:25:45 | Re: Launching PostgreSQL KB Project Mark 2 |