Re: 7.5 beta version

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.5 beta version
Date: 2004-04-06 13:51:33
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE34B6BE@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

1) Is this depending on the server, or the fact that there is a
different libpq.dll in the path? Does a non-win32 client work against
the win32 server, and vice versa?

2) Are you using the import library from mingw, or the one from the old
visual C++ compile? If you are using the import library from the old
Visual compile, what happens if you change to the mingw one?

//Magnus

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dann Corbit [mailto:DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:43 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] 7.5 beta version
>
>
> I am having some trouble interfacing the 7.5 server built
> with MINGW with tools generated using other compilers.
>
> I suspect that the issue is one of default structure packing.
> In the old version we were using, we built PostgreSQL using
> Intel C++ or MS
> VC++ and the same for the libpq and other interfaces.
>
> Now that I have built the server and associated tools with
> Mingw and a version of the interface system with MS VC++ and
> Intel C++, I have problems using (for instance) libpq.
>
> Some character strings returned early in the struct are fine,
> but the numeric fields occurring later are garbled.
>
> Now, this issue seems like it must have happened before,
> since the server might be generated on some 64 bit platform
> and the interface library on some other platform.
>
> In particular, this function:
>
> char *PQgetvalue(const PGresult *res, int tup_num, int field_num) {
> if (!check_tuple_field_number(res, tup_num, field_num))
> return NULL;
> return res->tuples[tup_num][field_num].value;
> }
>
> Seems to return nonsense when I get to pointers to non-character data.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-04-06 13:59:09 Re: Solaris initdb fails: shmmax tweak alternative?
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2004-04-06 13:14:21 Re: pg_hba.conf view from the database?