Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
Cc: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump
Date: 2005-06-28 20:51:39
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE094574@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> >> I *think* that's easy enough to do in time for 8.1. Trivial patch
> >> attached. I hope it's enough :-) It passed my very quick testing...
> >>
> >> (Yup, I read the mails aobut PGCLIENTENCODING, but an option to
> >> pg_dump is certainly easier)
> >
> > You forgot to document the long option, I think.
>
> Are the man pages generated from the sgml docs? Have never
> had a look at that.

Yes - using docbook2man.

//Magnus

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-28 20:55:13 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2005-06-28 20:48:56 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2005-06-28 20:55:13 Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2005-06-28 20:48:56 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed TODO: --encoding option for pg_dump