Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4
Date: 2005-06-22 20:24:35
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE094556@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > Last chance for any Kerberos 4 users to speak up --- otherwise I'll
> > apply this soon.
>
> If you just want someone to test it I can do that. I don't
> actually use it normally though.

I don't think "just testing" is enough - somebody needs to actually
maintain it...

> As far as security issues the only issues I'm aware of is a)
> it uses plain DES which is just a 56 bit key and crackable by
> brute force and b) cross-domain authentication is broken.

Yeah. But it has been declared dead by the Kerberos folks
(http://www.faqs.org/faqs/kerberos-faq/general/section-7.html. And this
document is from 2000, an dit was declared already then)...

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Mitchell 2005-06-22 20:31:56 Vacuum advice
Previous Message David Parker 2005-06-22 20:05:07 dump/restore bytea fields

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2005-06-22 20:34:19 Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-06-22 20:23:02 Re: commit_delay, siblings