Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas
Date: 2002-06-09 19:46:21
Message-ID: 6967.1023651981@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> Attached is the result which seems to work OK here. The existing
> current_schemas() works as previously, & I have added
> current_schemas(bool) which will return the full implicit/explicit path
> if passed true or the explicit path is pass false.

This patch will break the existing current_schemas() function AFAICS;
the code will be testing a value that it wasn't passed, and getting a
random result, so it's unclear which behavior you'd get.

Since current_schemas() isn't in any released code yet, it's not by
any means set in stone. I'd be willing to simply change it to take a
boolean parameter always. Comments anyone?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2002-06-09 20:16:15 Re: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit schemas
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-09 15:59:55 Re: revised sample SRF C function; proposed SRF API