Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3
Date: 2008-07-15 19:56:15
Message-ID: 6929.1216151775@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> Well now that was cool to see. I got some failures, of course, but
> nothing stands out to me as an obvious bug. I attach the diffs file
> (with the citext.sql failure removed) for your perusal. What would be
> the best way for me to resolve those permission issues?

Don't run the tests in a read-only directory, perhaps.

> Or do they matter for sanity-checking citext?

Hard to tell --- I'd suggest trying to get a clean run. As for what you
have, the first diff hunk suggests you've got the wrong function
properties for citextsend/citextrecv.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kless 2008-07-15 20:04:16 Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type
Previous Message Mark Mielke 2008-07-15 19:38:35 Re: Fwd: Proposal - UUID data type